CrowdMind/Fred-9B

VISIONPricing:Input $0.431 / Cached $0.0862 / Output $1.12Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:9BQuant:FP8Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Sep 11, 2026License:apache-2.0Architecture:Transformer0.0K Open Weights Featherless Exclusive Cold

Fred-9B is an experimental 9-billion parameter language model fine-tuned by CrowdMind from Qwen 3.5 9B using LoRA. Optimized for conversational AI, reasoning, and mathematical problem-solving, this model serves as a testbed for local LLM experimentation and personal AI assistants. It features a 32768-token context length and is designed for tasks requiring arithmetic and logical deduction.

Loading preview...

Overview

Fred-9B is an experimental 9-billion parameter language model developed by CrowdMind, fine-tuned from the Qwen 3.5 9B base model using LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) with a rank of 128 and alpha of 256. It was trained for 300 steps on approximately 3.21 million tokens, focusing on conversational and reasoning capabilities. The model demonstrates proficiency in handling simple arithmetic and order-of-operations problems, making it suitable for specific problem-solving tasks.

Key Capabilities

  • Conversational AI: Designed for experimental conversational interactions.
  • Reasoning: Shows ability in logical deduction and problem-solving.
  • Mathematical Tasks: Capable of solving basic arithmetic and order-of-operations questions.
  • Fine-tuning Experimentation: Serves as a practical example for testing LoRA/QLoRA fine-tuning workflows.

Intended Use Cases

  • Local LLM Experimentation: Ideal for developers exploring local deployments and fine-tuning.
  • Personal AI Assistants: Suitable for building and testing personal AI assistants.
  • Coding and Reasoning: Can be used for experimental coding and reasoning prompts.
  • Mathematical Problem-Solving: Particularly useful for prompts involving arithmetic and logical problem-solving.

Limitations

As an experimental fine-tune, Fred-9B has limitations including a relatively small number of training steps, lack of an evaluation dataset during training, and potential for hallucination. Its behavior can vary, and performance should be rigorously evaluated with held-out datasets and established benchmarks for serious applications.