INSAIT-Institute/GRPO-Think-7B-16k

TEXT GENERATIONPricing:Input $0.4 / Cached $0.08 / Output $0.8Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:7.6BQuant:FP8Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Aug 12, 2026License:cc-by-nc-sa-4.0Architecture:Transformer Open Weights Featherless Exclusive Cold

INSAIT-Institute's GRPO-Think-7B-16k is a 7.6 billion parameter code verifier model, fine-tuned from DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B. It is specifically designed for judging and ranking candidate solutions to competitive programming problems, trained using Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) including on-policy learning, negative samples, and intermediate thinking traces with a 16k reasoning-token budget. This model excels at evaluating and providing feedback on code generation, making it suitable for automated code assessment and reward function generation.

Loading preview...

Aletheia: GRPO-Think-7B-16k Code Verifier

GRPO-Think-7B-16k is a 7.6 billion parameter code verifier developed by INSAIT-Institute, part of the Aletheia project. It is fine-tuned from deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and trained using a specific Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) approach called GRPO (Generative Reinforcement learning with Policy Optimization).

Key Characteristics & Training:

  • GRPO-Think Verifier: Utilizes on-policy learning, negative samples, and intermediate thinking traces.
  • 16k Reasoning-Token Budget: Trained with a maximum completion length of 16,000 reasoning tokens.
  • Dataset: Fine-tuned on the INSAIT-Institute/Aletheia-Train dataset, which consists of 50,000 competitive programming instances with multiple candidate solutions.
  • Purpose: Designed to judge and rank candidate code solutions for competitive programming problems, identifying the correct one among several options.

Intended Uses:

  • RLHF / RLAIF: Can serve as a plug-and-play reward function for optimizing code generation policies.
  • Automated Evaluation: Suitable for LLM-as-a-judge applications in various code-related tasks.
  • Research: Provides a robust platform for studying the impact of thinking traces, on-policy learning, and negative samples in training effective code verifiers.