Jeesup/svd-safety-l3_swift_remove50_swapgapiter_evfront_b010

TEXT GENERATIONPricing:Input $0.37 / Cached $0.074 / Output $0.38Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:8BQuant:FP8Context Size:8kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Sep 18, 2026License:llama3Architecture:Transformer Featherless Exclusive Cold

Jeesup/svd-safety-l3_swift_remove50_swapgapiter_evfront_b010 is an 8-billion parameter Llama-3-8B-Instruct checkpoint, compressed to 50% of its original dense parameters using Swift-SVD with LoRA recovery. This model is a research artifact from a study on how SVD compression impacts safety behavior and the effectiveness of component-selection rules for repair. It is specifically designed for measuring safety/utility trade-offs under compression, rather than serving as a general-purpose chat model.

Loading preview...

Overview

This model, svd-safety-l3_swift_remove50_swapgapiter_evfront_b010, is a research artifact derived from meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct. It has been compressed using Swift-SVD with LoRA recovery, resulting in a 50.0% reduction in dense parameters. Following compression, it underwent 10 rounds of iterative parameter-neutral swapping, selected by the gap_iter rule, to study the repair of safety damage.

Key Characteristics

  • Base Model: meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct
  • Compression Method: Swift-SVD with LoRA recovery, removing 49.97% of parameters.
  • Iterative Repair: 10 rounds of gap_iter rule-based swapping, restoring 1.00% of dense parameters.
  • Context Length: 8192 tokens.

Measured Performance (Research Context)

  • AdvBench ASR (HarmBench judge): 0.0942
  • StrongREJECT ASR (HarmBench judge): 0.2556
  • Macro over-refusal (WildGuard): 0.1118
  • WikiText-2 perplexity: 55.4647

Intended Use and Limitations

This checkpoint is not a general-purpose chat model. Its primary purpose is to serve as an experimental subject for measuring safety/utility trade-offs under compression. Several arms in this research grid are deliberately safety-degraded relative to the original Llama-3-8B-Instruct. Users should evaluate this model themselves and understand its experimental nature before drawing conclusions or attempting deployment.