YFC-112358/Qwen3.6-27B-Della-Deckard-Isometry-Geodesic-v2
YFC-112358/Qwen3.6-27B-Della-Deckard-Isometry-Geodesic-v2 is a 27 billion parameter Qwen3.6-based language model, created by YFC-112358, that significantly reduces 'thinking' token generation for grade-school math problems by 7x without accuracy loss. This model is a linear task-vector merge, specifically optimized for high-volume, short-answer workloads and latency-bound interactive use. It excels at compressing output for trivial inputs, making it suitable for cost-sensitive batch inference.
Loading preview...
Model Overview
YFC-112358/Qwen3.6-27B-Della-Deckard-Isometry-Geodesic-v2 is a 27 billion parameter Qwen3.6-based model, developed by YFC-112358, that applies a linear task-vector merge to reduce generated 'thinking' tokens. This model is a direct merge of Qwen3.6-27B-Della-Deckard-v1 with a terseness task vector from maldv/Qwen3.6-27B-Isometry-Terse, specifically targeting 400 two-dimensional projection tensors. The merge is notable for its simplicity, as the two contributing edits were found to be orthogonal, allowing for a straightforward linear addition without complex interference resolution.
Key Capabilities & Performance
- Significant Token Compression: Achieves a 7.1x reduction in 'think' tokens on GSM8K (from 539.5 to 76.0 median tokens) compared to its
Della-Deckard-v1predecessor, and 14.9x against the officialQwen/Qwen3.6-27Bbase model. - Maintained Accuracy on Simple Tasks: GSM8K pass@1 accuracy did not measurably drop (0.75 to 0.85, though on a small sample size).
- Identical Vision Tower: The vision tower is byte-identical to the official Qwen3.6-27B, implying no degradation in multimodal capabilities, though no specific multimodal evaluation was performed.
Use Cases
- Good Fit:
- High-volume short-answer workloads where models might over-generate 'thinking' tokens.
- Latency-bound interactive applications.
- Cost-bound batch inference, due to reduced token generation.
- Bad Fit:
- Competition math, multi-hop reasoning, or long agentic chains where deliberation is desired, as it shows regression on harder multi-step problems.
- Any task requiring high accuracy on complex reasoning, as the model failed acceptance gates for hard problem accuracy and think length.