agentlans/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-Multiple-Choice-Maker

Hugging Face
TEXT GENERATIONPricing:Input $0.04 / Cached $0.008 / Output $0.08Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:1.5BQuant:BF16Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Apr 1, 2025License:apache-2.0Architecture:Transformer0.0K Open Weights Featherless Exclusive Warm

The agentlans/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-Multiple-Choice-Maker is a 1.5 billion parameter instruction-tuned causal language model, based on the Qwen2.5 architecture, developed by agentlans. It is specifically fine-tuned to generate multiple-choice questions in XML format from input text. This model excels at creating assessment materials for educational purposes and generating benchmark questions for machine learning evaluations, offering a specialized solution for automated question generation.

Loading preview...

Overview

This model, agentlans/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct-Multiple-Choice-Maker, is a 1.5 billion parameter Qwen2.5-based instruction-tuned model specifically designed for generating multiple-choice questions in XML format. It is fine-tuned to process input text and produce structured quiz content, making it a specialized tool for educational and machine learning applications.

Key Capabilities

  • XML-formatted Question Generation: Produces multiple-choice questions with choices and correct answers embedded within a <quiz> XML structure.
  • Educational Content Creation: Automates the generation of assessment materials for exams and quizzes.
  • Machine Learning Benchmark Generation: Useful for creating datasets to evaluate natural language processing models.
  • Specialized Fine-tuning: Leverages a custom dataset derived from open-source sociology textbooks and the agentlans/finewebedu-multiple-choice dataset, fine-tuned using LLaMA-Factory with LoRA.

Good for

  • Educators and Content Creators: Streamlining the process of creating multiple-choice questions from textual content.
  • Researchers and Developers: Generating structured benchmark datasets for evaluating NLP models' understanding and question-answering capabilities.
  • Automated Assessment Systems: Integrating into systems that require programmatic generation of quiz content.

Limitations

  • Generated outputs may require manual review to ensure contextual accuracy, appropriateness, and that only one correct answer is provided.
  • The XML output, while robust for validation, requires further processing for human readability or direct machine assessment.