barozp/Qwen3.8-27B-Opus-Distill-v2

VISIONConcurrent Unit Cost:2Model Size:27BQuant:FP8Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Aug 17, 2026License:apache-2.0Architecture:Transformer0.0K Open Weights Featherless Exclusive Cold

barozp/Qwen3.8-27B-Opus-Distill-v2 is a 27 billion parameter language model, fine-tuned from Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B, specifically optimized for enhanced reasoning capabilities through distillation from verified Claude Opus traces. This version addresses a critical reasoning-loop bug present in its predecessor, ensuring reliable output under complex constraint stacking. It maintains the base model's native vision-language and MTP capabilities while significantly improving performance on reasoning benchmarks like ARC Challenge and GPQA Diamond.

Loading preview...

Qwen3.8-27B-Opus-Distill-v2: Enhanced Reasoning with Bug Fixes

This model is a fine-tuned version of the Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B base model, a dense 27 billion parameter model with native vision-language and MTP capabilities. The primary goal of this iteration is to significantly improve reasoning quality while resolving a critical bug found in the previous version (v1).

Key Enhancements & Bug Fixes

  • Reasoning Loop Fix: Addresses a specific bug where v1 would enter a non-converging self-verification loop when faced with stacked output-format constraints (e.g., "no prose" + "no markdown"), leading to zero visible output and token budget exhaustion. This fix was achieved by meticulously reconstructing the training data with 100% verified-genuine Claude Opus reasoning traces, removing fabricated or unverified content.
  • Improved Reasoning Quality: Despite fixing the bug, the model retains and slightly refines the reasoning-quality gains. Benchmarks show notable improvements in arc_challenge (acc_norm +0.034) and gpqa_diamond (acc_norm +0.237) compared to the base model.
  • Data Provenance: The training dataset, barozp/opus-reasoning-distill-v2, consists of 11,716 examples, all traced to verified-genuine Opus sources, ensuring higher data integrity.

Performance Highlights

Benchmarking with lm-evaluation-harness (0-shot, loglikelihood, chat template OFF, QUICK mode) demonstrates:

  • arc_challenge: 0.6220 acc_norm (vs. 0.5880 base)
  • gpqa_diamond: 0.4697 acc_norm (vs. 0.2323 base)
  • Language modeling (wikitext) and general knowledge (MMLU) remain largely unaffected.

Should I use this for my use case?

  • Yes, if you require robust reasoning capabilities: Especially for tasks demanding complex logical deduction or adherence to multiple output constraints, where the previous version might have failed.
  • Yes, if you need a reliable model for structured outputs: The fix for the reasoning-loop bug makes it more dependable for generating code, structured data, or other formats requiring strict adherence to instructions.
  • Consider if vision-language or MTP are important: These capabilities are carried over from the base Qwen3.8-27B model, making it suitable for multimodal applications.