introvoyz041/ChemDFM-R-14B

TEXT GENERATIONPricing:Input $0.431 / Cached $0.0862 / Output $1.12Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:14.8BQuant:FP8Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Sep 1, 2026License:agpl-3.0Architecture:Transformer Open Weights Featherless Exclusive Cold

ChemDFM-R-14B is a 14.8 billion parameter Chemical Reasoning LLM developed by Zihan Zhao et al. (OpenDFM) with a 32768 token context length. It is enhanced with atomized chemical knowledge through the ChemFG dataset and a mix-sourced distillation method. This model excels at chemical reasoning tasks, providing interpretable, rationale-driven outputs for scientific applications.

Loading preview...

ChemDFM-R: Chemical Reasoning LLM

ChemDFM-R-14B is a 14.8 billion parameter large language model specifically designed for chemical reasoning. Developed by Zihan Zhao et al. (OpenDFM), this model addresses the limitations of general LLMs in scientific domains by integrating deep chemical understanding.

Key Capabilities & Features

  • Atomized Chemical Knowledge: Enhanced through the ChemFG dataset, which annotates functional groups in molecules and their changes during reactions, providing a fundamental understanding of chemical principles.
  • Mix-Sourced Distillation: Integrates atomized knowledge expertise with general reasoning skills, followed by domain-specific reinforcement learning.
  • Rationale-Driven Outputs: Provides interpretable reasoning chains, improving reliability and transparency in chemical problem-solving.
  • Cutting-Edge Performance: Achieves strong results on diverse chemical benchmarks, as detailed in their paper.
  • High Context Length: Supports a 32768 token context, allowing for processing of complex chemical information.

When to Use This Model

ChemDFM-R-14B is ideal for applications requiring advanced chemical reasoning, such as:

  • Analyzing and describing complex molecules.
  • Predicting and explaining chemical reactions.
  • Generating interpretable rationales for chemical processes.
  • Tasks where understanding functional group changes is critical.

Users should be aware that while powerful, the model may still generate incorrect or misleading information, and results should be verified by domain experts.