lihaoxin2020/qwen3-4b-sft-gpt54-ep2-instance-rubric-gpt41-step200

TEXT GENERATIONConcurrency Cost:1Model Size:4BQuant:BF16Ctx Length:32kPublished:Apr 24, 2026Architecture:Transformer Cold

The lihaoxin2020/qwen3-4b-sft-gpt54-ep2-instance-rubric-gpt41-step200 is a 4 billion parameter model, likely based on the Qwen3 architecture, representing a GRPO checkpoint. This model is a fine-tuned version, specifically trained using a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) approach with GPT-4 for instance rubric generation, indicating a specialization in generating structured, evaluative content. Its development involved a specific training run tracked on Weights & Biases, suggesting a focus on refinement and performance in its niche application.

Loading preview...

Model Overview

The lihaoxin2020/qwen3-4b-sft-gpt54-ep2-instance-rubric-gpt41-step200 is a 4 billion parameter language model, identified as a GRPO (likely a specific training methodology or checkpoint type) checkpoint. This model has undergone supervised fine-tuning (SFT) using outputs from GPT-4, specifically for generating instance rubrics. The "ep2" and "step200" in its name suggest it's a snapshot from a particular stage of its training process.

Key Characteristics

  • Architecture: Likely based on the Qwen3 family, given the naming convention.
  • Parameter Count: 4 billion parameters, offering a balance between performance and computational efficiency.
  • Training Method: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with data generated by GPT-4.
  • Specialization: Optimized for generating instance rubrics, implying a strong capability in structured evaluation and content creation.
  • Development Tracking: The training run was meticulously tracked on Weights & Biases, indicating a data-driven and iterative development process.

Potential Use Cases

This model is particularly well-suited for applications requiring:

  • Automated Rubric Generation: Creating detailed and structured evaluation rubrics for various tasks or instances.
  • Content Evaluation Systems: Assisting in the automated assessment of content based on predefined criteria.
  • Educational Tools: Generating feedback guidelines or grading rubrics for assignments.
  • Quality Assurance: Developing consistent evaluation standards for products or services.