nbeerbower/SmolNemo-12B-FFT-experimental

TEXT GENERATIONPricing:Input $1.2 / Output $4.8Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:12.2BQuant:FP8Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Nov 25, 2024License:apache-2.0Architecture:Transformer Open Weights Featherless Exclusive Cold

SmolNemo-12B-FFT-experimental by nbeerbower is a 12.2 billion parameter experimental language model with a 32768 token context length. It is a full finetune of Mahou-1.5-mistral-nemo-12B-lorablated on the HuggingFaceTB/smoltalk dataset. This model is explicitly noted as having erratic behavior and poor performance, serving primarily as a public experiment in training parameters rather than a production-ready solution.

Loading preview...

SmolNemo-12B-FFT-experimental Overview

SmolNemo-12B-FFT-experimental is an experimental 12.2 billion parameter language model developed by nbeerbower. It is a full finetune of the Mahou-1.5-mistral-nemo-12B-lorablated model, trained on the HuggingFaceTB/smoltalk dataset. This model is shared as part of an ongoing exploration into training parameters and ideas, rather than a formal release.

Key Characteristics

  • Experimental Nature: This model is explicitly labeled as an experiment, not intended for production use.
  • Performance: It exhibits erratic behavior and poor performance, with the developer noting potential conflicts with Mistral Instruct and ChatML as contributing factors.
  • Training Method: The model underwent Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) for 0.1 epochs using 8x A100 GPUs.
  • Context Length: It supports a context length of 32768 tokens.

Evaluation Results

According to the Open LLM Leaderboard, the model shows low performance across various metrics:

  • Avg.: 8.32
  • IFEval (0-Shot): 33.48
  • BBH (3-Shot): 6.54
  • MATH Lvl 5 (4-Shot): 0.23
  • GPQA (0-shot): 1.34
  • MuSR (0-shot): 5.92
  • MMLU-PRO (5-shot): 2.41

Good for

  • Research and Experimentation: Ideal for developers and researchers interested in observing the effects of specific training parameters and finetuning approaches.
  • Learning: Useful for understanding potential challenges and outcomes in model training, particularly regarding conflicts between instruction-tuning formats.
  • Transparency: Provides insight into an iterative development process for language models.