xw1234gan/seccodeplt-qwen2.5-coder-3b-grpo-no-kl-real-reward-v2

TEXT GENERATIONPricing:Input $0.32 / Cached $0.064 / Output $1.6Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:3.1BQuant:BF16Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Aug 14, 2026Architecture:Transformer Featherless Exclusive Cold

The xw1234gan/seccodeplt-qwen2.5-coder-3b-grpo-no-kl-real-reward-v2 model is a 3.1 billion parameter Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct variant, fine-tuned using GRPO without KL regularization for secure code generation. It focuses on improving compliance and safety in generated code, specifically for the SecCodePLT+ experiment. This model is optimized to correct causal-label alignment and utilizes a ReaL safety-unit-test reward with DAPO-style token loss, making it suitable for applications requiring robust code safety and compliance.

Loading preview...

Model Overview

The seccodeplt-qwen2.5-coder-3b-grpo-no-kl-real-reward-v2 is a specialized 3.1 billion parameter model derived from Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct. Developed by xw1234gan, this version was fine-tuned using the GRPO (Generative Reinforcement Learning with Policy Optimization) method, specifically without KL regularization, for the SecCodePLT+ compliance experiment.

Key Features and Training

  • Reinforcement Learning: Utilizes GRPO for fine-tuning, focusing on improving code generation quality based on a reward signal.
  • Causal-Label Alignment: Incorporates corrections for causal-label alignment during training.
  • Reward Mechanism: Employs the official ReaL safety-unit-test reward, combined with DAPO-style token loss and dynamic sampling, to guide the learning process towards safer and more compliant code.
  • Training Data: Trained on a 655-example training split with a specific seed (42).

Evaluation Highlights

Evaluated on 164 official test examples using greedy decoding, the model achieved notable results in specific areas:

  • Output Format Pass: 96.95%
  • Syntax Pass: 96.95%
  • Safety Pass: 56.71%
  • Joint Pass: 15.24%

Limitations

It is important to note that this is a single-seed research checkpoint. Its evaluation was conducted with a resource-bounded Python verifier specific to the benchmark, and therefore, it does not provide a general guarantee of secure code generation for all contexts.