yuxuanw8/qwen3b-racpo-v2-fisher-acc-hotpot-2device-collate-0.75-0.25-checkpoint-210

TEXT GENERATIONPricing:Input $0.32 / Cached $0.064 / Output $1.6Concurrent Unit Cost:1Model Size:3.1BQuant:BF16Context Size:32kTool Calling:SupportedPublished:Sep 29, 2026Architecture:Transformer Featherless Exclusive Cold

The yuxuanw8/qwen3b-racpo-v2-fisher-acc-hotpot-2device-collate-0.75-0.25-checkpoint-210 model is a 3.1 billion parameter language model with a 32768 token context length. Developed by yuxuanw8, this model is a checkpoint from a fine-tuning process, likely optimized for specific tasks given its name components like 'racpo' and 'hotpot'. Its primary differentiator and specific use cases are not detailed in the provided model card, indicating it may be an intermediate or experimental version.

Loading preview...

Model Overview

This model, yuxuanw8/qwen3b-racpo-v2-fisher-acc-hotpot-2device-collate-0.75-0.25-checkpoint-210, is a 3.1 billion parameter language model with a substantial context length of 32768 tokens. It represents a specific checkpoint within a fine-tuning or training process, as suggested by its detailed name which includes terms like 'racpo', 'fisher-acc', and 'hotpot'.

Key Characteristics

  • Parameter Count: 3.1 billion parameters, placing it in the medium-sized LLM category.
  • Context Length: Supports a long context window of 32768 tokens, which can be beneficial for tasks requiring extensive input or memory.
  • Development Stage: The model name indicates it is a checkpoint from an ongoing or completed training run, potentially for research or specific application development.

Use Cases and Limitations

Due to the limited information in the provided model card, specific direct use cases, downstream applications, or out-of-scope uses are not detailed. The model card explicitly states "More Information Needed" across various sections, including model type, language, license, training data, and evaluation results. Therefore, its intended purpose, performance benchmarks, and potential biases or risks are currently undefined.

Users should be aware that without further documentation, the optimal application and reliability of this model cannot be fully assessed. It is recommended to seek additional information from the developer regarding its training objectives, evaluation metrics, and intended deployment scenarios.